Search "user:centaur02"

With engines and anything else allowed. To expand theoretical knowledge. Both sides for each player, 3 days for a move or smth like that, casual, of course. :) My first suggestion is 1.Kg3 Nxf2. I bel…

https://lichess.org/study/e0Vh1KYH/dzQeWyrV - I believe that in the 1.Bd4 Kb3 2.Rg8 variation white achieves draw, a quite nice one with an enjoyable end position.

In the same study I am doing some kind of primitive analysis - just entering variants until the black reaches +3 advantage (if they are lucky in the specific variation) and then stopping, basically. I…

I looked at 4.Kh5 line (and 4.Bxb2 line which transposes into 4.Kh5 line, imo) using engine and updated the study with the engine line. (See above the post #2.) It seems to me that black is better and…

https://pastebin.com/raw/Z50TCnmK - Racing Kings opening theory, 3 plies deep. :D Moves that aren't there I believe to be losing. Moves with question signs are a bit bad, but not sure about the result…

Main line seems to be such: https://lichess.org/study/e0Vh1KYH/DRnVGgxZ Black is an exhange up.

What do you think about move 2.Kh3 after 1.Bd4 Be4? Is it bad enough to lose? How do you think? Analysing it with an engine, can't make my mind up.

@ChipoLa14 said in #7: > If someone really found solution of it, Racing Kings will be really boring. For cheaters only. No human is going to memorise information of such size.

Yeah, I believe too that Racing Kings is draw. Though that means almost nothing for human play, imo.

1.Nf4 Nxf2 2.Nxc2 Nxh1 3.Nxa1 Rb4 4.Rxh1 Rxf4 5.Kg3 Ra4 6.Nc2 Kb3 - this is the line I'm going to play as black. It is one I haven't analysed completely yet and, well, I believe that the evaluation of…