Search "user:Toadofsky"

Regarding the "Stockfish" research proposal... Stockfish isn't tuned to play these sorts of positions. You'd need to tune it, for example: https://www.chessprogramming.org/Stockfish%27s_Tuning_Method …

@Craze said in #10: > I tried this system in casual bullet against 2700-2800 rated players as an experiment. Kept getting owned. Thanks for trying this crazy gambit. I wonder if it's possible to maste…

Try asking the maintainer of the userstyle in question?

First, get to 1800. Then, get to 1801, then 1802, etc.

I guess GM Alburt's "Chess Training Pocket Book: 300 Most Important Positions and Ideas" may be of interest.

As our resident comedian... what about tripled pawns? :-) But seriously, by now enough chess games have been played that it's possible to do some research about positive effects of tripled pawns and h…

@DABO5000 said in #24: > But speaking on mathematics. Because there is a very large sample size on both sites. Numbers should be very close to one another. Lichess also publishes its code, in case the…

@DABO5000 said in #20: > 3. Mathematically my numbers are supported. Chess.com says .3 percent of users are cheating. And lets be honest here. Lichess is great, but they will never with the limited re…

Yeah... listening to professionals and their thought processes has been interesting, although eventually commentary without engines will be phased out since spectators get what they ask for.

@Motroskin said in #3: > and with the 4 blunders and 1 mistake in gives 62% of accuracy which makes total sense for me. ... because your moves were 62% accurate. 0% would represent "every move is a bl…