This is my honest opinion, but I think there were better people than Carlsen.
@d2d4again said in #26:
> By this definition it would be Paul Morphy or Bob Fischer. Paul Murphy and Bob Fischer were better than him. But that's history.
I think that is very true. Bobby Fischer and Paul Murphy were really good. Of course way better than Magnus. They are stronger than Magnus in anyway.
You may think that Carlsen may be the best player now - and news flash, he's playing for 1 bitcoin, which is approximately $50,000 - but sorry to the "Magnus Lovers" but I think Kasparov is better. After all, he is #1 today.
As I said earlier, this is my honest opinion. I do not mean to hurt or abuse anyone here in any way