lichess.org
Donate

Group trophies of the same type for a cleaner interface

It would be better to group trophies of the same type when they exceed a certain number, with a badge showing the quantity, this is just ugly: @Lance5500
@The_Shrike said in #1:
> It would be better to group trophies of the same type when they exceed a certain number, with a badge showing the quantity, this is just ugly: @Lance5500

Nothing to add to the previous post about the same topic from almost 5 years ago:
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/about-the-icons-marathon-top-1-10-50-or-100-on-the-player-profile-page#3

Interesting coincidence: both topic starters have played just a few rated games per so many years (less than typical top100 marathon players play per one marathon). But they care so much about the look of the pages of the successeful lichess players who have played countless amount of rated games and won a lot of different kinds of the brilliantly designed unique Lichess marathon cups.
@Lance5500 said in #4:
> Nothing to add to the previous post about the same topic from almost 5 years ago:
> lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/about-the-icons-marathon-top-1-10-50-or-100-on-the-player-profile-page#3
>
> Interesting coincidence: both topic starters have played just a few rated games per so many years (less than typical top100 marathon players play per one marathon). But they care so much about the look of the pages of the successeful lichess players who have played countless amount of rated games and won a lot of different kinds of the brilliantly designed unique Lichess marathon cups.
LOL get roasted @The_Shrike
I know there's a bunch of solid replies from both topics already, but I'd like to add something else to it because I seen this blog post earlier:
lichess.org/@/thijscom/blog/lichess-marathon-statistics/4XwGOl4s

The closest one to have that many trophies which is noted on that article is @papasi and doesn't have as many to cause the username overlap (yet). So you just so happen to have come across the only profile that has trophies off the charts and thus remaking all profiles over just one at the moment would be overkill, lol!
@The_Shrike said in #1:
> It would be better to group trophies of the same type when they exceed a certain number, with a badge showing the quantity, this is just ugly: @Lance5500
no it looks nice
@PkGam said in #6:
> The closest one to have that many trophies which is noted on that article is @papasi and doesn't have as many to cause the username overlap (yet). So you just so happen to have come across the only profile that has trophies off the charts and thus remaking all profiles over just one at the moment would be overkill, lol!

Ah I didn't realize that, thanks for the info, I saw that profile and thought it was a common thing that maybe wasn't noticed by the developers, my bad.

@Lance5500 said in #4:
> Interesting coincidence: both topic starters have played just a few rated games per so many years

I thought this was the section where to make suggestions to improve the site, apparently they are not welcome if you don't have a certain number of matches, that is weird to say the least
@The_Shrike said in #8:
> Ah I didn't realize that, thanks for the info, I saw that profile and thought it was a common thing that maybe wasn't noticed by the developers, my bad.
>
>
>
> I thought this was the section where to make suggestions to improve the site, apparently they are not welcome if you don't have a certain number of matches, that is weird to say the least

Some circumstances (mentioned above) of the posts of both topic starters seem weird as well. Also it's nice to make a suggestion before the proper research which is available for everybody. And it is more likely a suggestion to decrease dramatically the weight of achievements of the most successeful Lichess marathon players. The suggestion to such topic starters could be to focus on winning the maximal amount of the very beautiful Lichess marathon cups on their own instead of trying to cut the rewards from the great marathon players.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.