Interesting game what are your thought about it?

@Chessy64 but yes I do hope I play better in the future! Losing is never fun and I try to find what I did wrong and actually fix it. Clearly not everyone thinks this way and instead decides to barrage prospective opponents with accusations, but to each their own.

@Chessy64 said in #8:
> I think the game is an interesting game I never mentioned the word cheating you are jumping to conclusions

...the last refuge of the scoundrel. ;)

Did you count your engine moves this time though?

@potatoheadlol said in #13:
> Did you count your engine moves this time though?
Only God is Perfect ...

OP's opponent played against OP who played very accurate in my opinion too accurate what are your opinions about this game?

Somebody should be in Gitmo over this <radio edit>. ~ Rear Admiral <redacted for national security reasons>

@Chessy64 You caused no problems for your opponent and they were able to avoid any possible counterplay after achieving a practically winning position from the opening. In this day and age, with the amount of information available on the internet for free or not, it is now possible for low-rated players to know an opening much better than someone much, much higher rated than themselves. I encourage you to look within and try and cover up this hole in your repertoire, and look to do better next time. Don't take your own shortcomings out on others and never be afraid to improve yourself.

Or continue to play 100 bullet games a day whatever works. ;)

Camel Clutcher?

can a Mod close this post obviously people are being biased by not acknowledging how strange it is for a player who could not maintain a rating of 1500 in rapid on chess com last time I checked and who's highest rating is 1674 for rapid on lichess and cannot beat anyone higher than a rating of 1732 in a rated game somehow manages to beat a player who is 2357 in around 75 moves with 97% accuracy does not find that strange obviously they are not looking at the facts and are making personal opinions furthermore it is normal for a player to have 94% accuracy if they are higher rated but it is not normal for a lower rated player with no history of beating decent or strong players to play so accurate, @CamelClutcher if you think it is normal to lose constantly to 1400s then crush a 2357 playing a perfect game you must be high or something

I believe that this is a completely normal occurrence. Regardless of a player's rating, we all have upsets. I can consistently lose to 2300s/2400s, and occasionally win against 2600/2700s. I can also randomly lose to a 1600, and it has happened occasionally otb... I don't see what the problem is here.