The lichess anti-cheat system is capable to counter this ?

@Cedur216 said in #9:
> Look up the videos linked in my blog if you need.
>
> What Lichess can do: spot cheaters with very advanced methods.
> What Lichess (and basically any other site) can't do:
> -> supervise all games automatically to catch smarter cheaters (not enough resources, that's where reports and mod work comes into play)
> -> prevent the intention to cheat, when a player wants to cheat, they do so until they're caught.
> -> fix people with paranoid attitudes about cheating.
well; there had been people in antichess community that took years to get banned for cheating... I am not going to name for 2 reasons:
1- that counts as shaming even though account is marked
2- there is many of those accounts i don't know about; and more expert people in the case know.

@Deadban said in #14:
> Yeah but you're not getting the point Cedur.
>
> The point is that Lichess' primary objective as a chess platform is to inform people about its anti-cheat system.
> It's that easy, it's even written in the about section: Lichess: free anti-cheat for everyone, forever.
you know; they can't say most part of CDT to public because as any other thing related to human; It has a weakness that can be exposed if you are smart enough; and this will end up the place to get filled with cheaters to brim.

@kinsana I don't understand why you are so upset over this, the blog states clearly that chess engines(including A.C.A.S), is fairly easy to detect by *pure statistics*. Even if the cheaters are able to get away with it in a few games, they are bound to get caught in the long run.

@kinsana said in #18:
> You may think i'm rude, but when someone is sweeping away fair concerns without making any effort to explain, i'll take it as rude also.

Not saying your grievances aren't valid but your reaction to them may still be a little overblown.

Here's a link that you may find useful:

www.verywellmind.com/what-is-rejection-sensitivity-4682652

sorry for being rude but it really might help!

@spidersneedlovetoo said in #24:
> sorry for being rude but it really might help!

Thank you for the link. I'm always curious to read about my mental flaws :)

I also hope you're not a psychiatrist, since you may misinterpret some social patterns...

@huangyudong said in #23:
> @kinsana I don't understand why you are so upset over this, the blog states clearly that chess engines(including A.C.A.S), is fairly easy to detect by *pure statistics*. Even if the cheaters are able to get away with it in a few games, they are bound to get caught in the long run.

I would like a proof of that, but ok...

@kinsana said in #25:
> Thank you for the link. I'm always curious to read about my mental flaws :)
>
> I also hope you're not a psychiatrist, since you may misinterpret some social patterns...

lol def not a psychiatrist. I have RSS so what inspired me to post was behavior i recognized in myself. hope it helps but don't think of it as a flaw, it's just the rough edges that need polish!

@kinsana said in #26:
> I would like a proof of that, but ok...
If you want to proof so bad, you can cheat yourself :-P

nvm

@huangyudong said in #28:
> If you want to proof so bad, you can cheat yourself :-P

It crossed my mind, but i'd rather be unpopular than irresponsible...