Most believable conspiracy theory to you?

@Dukedog said in #10:
> That Finland does not exist.Google it people.If it's on the internet it must be true!

We have that too: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bielefeld_conspiracy

Covid is a bioweapon and this is World War III. And the New World Order isn't a hoax.

Someone made covid 19

@Glaxow said in #8:
> Read these books. This is not a question of 5 minutes.
“If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough” – Einstein.

Mine is that Project Ultra still continues and is training serial killers.

1. We still don't know the worst of the original Project Ultra; many documents were shredded.
2. It was an international project. It used a Sydney University to do a study on students.

My specific example is the serial killer Ashley Mervyn Coulston. The whole case was weird. One, his crime life starts as a youth. Out of a blue sky [no family problems etc] ; he broke into a house and kidnapped three people at gunpoint. He only got a few months in a youth training centre for that! Then he went on as an adult to be a serial killer, including some highly suspected crimes that have never been investigated despite written requests by police officers with real clout. It's as though someone DOESN'T WANT them investigated.

Then there are his methods. Sophisticated, evil tactics that you could not learn from TV. It's as though someone TRAINED him. I am calling it. Absolutely suspicious. Project Ultra mark 2 written all over it. Even his arrest in the end; he didn't act like a normal criminal. He took a hostage and acted in the way a paramilitary soldier would.

@twighead said in #15:
> “If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough” – Einstein.
Einstein is also mentioned in these books. But not in your usual perspective. And, in general, he was wrong. This has been proven by modern physicists. The speed of light in a vacuum turned out to be unstable.

@Glaxow said in #17:
> Einstein is also mentioned in these books. But not in your usual perspective. And, in general, he was wrong. This has been proven by modern physicists. The speed of light in a vacuum turned out to be unstable.
One has to xonder: Vacuum? Measure? Photon?
What can you expect to find BESIDES something "unstable"?

@Glaxow said in #17:
> Einstein is also mentioned in these books. But not in your usual perspective.

Yeah, I downloaded the books and read what the autor wrote concerning Einstein and Newton. "Load of crap" would be a euphemism for it.

> And, in general, he was wrong. This has been proven by modern physicists. The speed of light in a vacuum turned out to be unstable.

You certainly have links to the respective papers by those physicists for us, don't you?

The invisible, indivisible divider
The unholy antispirit of incompletion