lichess.org
Donate

Edward or Emanuel Lasker free pdf with abgebraic notation

Hi does anybody know some source where i can get Common sense in chess or any other books from these two online for free with algebraic notation? because i found only ones with descriptive notation and that makes the understanding of the books harder , thanks :)
I don't think you will find them with algebraic notation

I guess if you managed to find versions with digital text rather than scanned images, you could write a script to convert it for you
thanks, i am now thinking if i really needs to go through the examples in the books... because i think it will be enough if i just read the book because i think it will improve my game even without examples.. what do you think?
Oh, I missed the mate in one. Oh, now mate in one with merely a pawn on the 8th rank. What a bug.

I am thinking that you would do better to read some chess books that are up to date. Of course there is some kind of nostalgia involved reading books about the foundation of modern chess. And surely you will benefit from reading. But, as with all theory, if you start in 1896 then good luck keeping up with the Kardashians. Does that make any sense to you? no?
Why not just learn descriptive notation? It's a fine way of viewing chess, each move from the perspective of its player.
James - I want to start with Lasker because first he is like in top 3 chess players of all time, secondly because i want to know his style of play and get most from it, i want to see his ideas about strategy because thats my weak spot and if he couldnt help me then i dont know... and as the cherry on top he in his book and probably his play use "art of war" which is the book i have and i wanted to apply it on chess... he made it for me

coledavis- yes but its too messy for me to constantly switching from side to side when i want to just learn something from it ... i must concentrate on which move was made not why was made
I see your point and of course he has a unique play style. I'm just saying good luck surprising someone with that in a tournament.

If you want to apply the art of war then stop playing chess altogether. Why? Because you will have to fight battles you have not already won. I have read Suntzu btw. and I find it questionable interpreting some sense into his writing that then should benefit my chess skills. Just because it is outdated. Ask Azzad or Ghadaffi.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.