I just wondering both players are 2000+ and in this game they made 4 blunders both.
How it is possible? I make 3 blunders at average, then i must be at 2500+
I know no one is perfect but this makes no sense.
@Zhai This looks like a high level game, particularly for blitz. I can t really see any blunders here except the final one.
@gayweather They made four blunders each according to stockfish.
It's 3+0. Of course there is going to be blunders. It's near impossible to play a perfect game with time trouble
@zaneanderman Can you find those blunders without fish? I don t see them, ofc everything is easier when the fish gives you clear winning lines, it just looks like a strong game to me without sf assistence, I d be happy to play a blitz game like this as either colour.
@gayweather I haven't actually studied the game. I was basically assuming
@Zhai was referencing the stockfish evaluation. Even if I did look through the game I doubt I would find the blunders due to me being sub 1500.
actually i think this is a very well played game for 3+0 and looking quickly without stockfish i didn't see any obvious blunder apart from black's last move, which is very understandable in such a short time control.
If by "blunder" you mean not seeing the computer's best plan in a very complicated position, then it's gonna happen very often in a tactical game.
nb: after looking briefly with stockfish, i'm still not sure why most of those are blunders..
2000 players make mistakes , how? well how do you make a mistake it just happens we are human we overlook things ,forget ... but the higher you go up games get a lot harder and a lapse in concentration or just a bad calculation happens.
I think they played both horrible, also needed to look a few times. But they obviously have no idea about king safety. And you dont need to think to not play a4.
Better than me but looks dubious still. Also the idea with e4 and f5,
